BELOW SHOULD LIST THE CASE NUMBERpatent-attorney-texas
ACF Code: patent-attorney-texas
^^ ABOVE SHOULD BE THE CASE NUMBER ^^
# INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (to self, for later): If you load this page with a “?case=2:23-cv-00310” (link, no quotes), then it should pull the case name and IP address from a database that I created.
# This page requires that the “Advanced Custom Fields” plug-in be activated, and that the CLF Child Theme be active.
The Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena is a legal notice that has been sent to internet service providers (ISPs) in the United States. The subpoena requires the ISPs to disclose the personal information of their subscribers who have allegedly downloaded copyrighted adult films without permission. Strike 3 Holdings LLC is a company that produces and distributes adult content, and they have been aggressively pursuing legal action against alleged copyright infringers.
If you are a defendant in the No case name found. (Case No. patent-attorney-texas) case in the No full court name found. and you have received a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena, or if you are concerned about the potential of receiving one, it is important to understand what it means and what your options are. In this article, we will provide you with an overview of the Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena and what you need to know to protect yourself.
The Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena is a legal notice that has been sent to internet service providers (ISPs) in the United States. The subpoena requires the ISPs to disclose the personal information of their subscribers who have allegedly downloaded copyrighted adult films without permission. Strike 3 Holdings LLC is a company that produces and distributes adult content, and they have been aggressively pursuing legal action against alleged copyright infringers.[Based on how you arrived at this article, it appears as if you are implicated in the No case name found. (Case No. patent-attorney-texas) lawsuit filed in the No full court name found.. (I am trying to get this to code right; this might not work, but at least I am trying).]
If you are a defendant in the patent-attorney-texas case and you have received a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena, or if you are concerned about the potential of receiving one, it is important to understand what it means and what your options are. In this article, we will provide you with an overview of the Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena and what you need to know to protect yourself.
What is the Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP Subpoena?
A subpoena is a legal document that requires a person or organization to provide information or testimony in a legal matter. The Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena that you received for your Case No. patent-attorney-texas is a type of subpoena that is sent to ISPs in order to obtain the personal information of their subscribers who have allegedly downloaded copyrighted adult films without permission.
The subpoena issued to the ISP in the patent-attorney-texas case was authorized by the federal court. It requires your ISP to disclose the subscriber’s name on your account, your address, and other identifying information. Once Strike 3 Holdings LLC obtains this information, they may use it to pursue legal action against the subscriber for copyright infringement.
How does Strike 3 Holdings LLC track alleged copyright infringers?
Strike 3 Holdings LLC tracks alleged copyright infringers by their IP addresses. As you can see by the title of your lawsuit, “No case name found.,” they have isolated at least one IP address which has been assigned to you on a particular date and time. There could be others as well.
When you use file sharing software that allows you to download and upload files from the internet, you leave footprints of where you have been (for example, look here to the “I Know What You Download” page, and enter the IP address from your patent-attorney-texas lawsuit.
When a user downloads a file, they are also uploading parts of the file to other users who are downloading it. Sometimes the Strike 3 Holdings LLC copyright holder is one of those users who records the IP addresses of each person downloading their content without a license.
Strike 3 Holdings LLC uses this system to track the IP addresses of users who are downloading their copyrighted adult films without permission. Once they have the IP address, they can obtain a subpoena from a court to force the ISP to disclose the subscriber’s personal information. This is what happened in your patent-attorney-texas case.
What are the potential consequences of receiving a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena?
If you receive a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena, it is important to take it seriously. Ignoring the subpoena or failing to respond can result in serious consequences, including:
- A Default Judgment: If you do not respond to the subpoena, Strike 3 Holdings LLC may be able to obtain a default judgment against you. This means that the court will hold you guilty of copyright infringement for not adhering to the federal rules in timely defending the claims against you, and it may award damages to Strike 3 Holdings LLC without a trial.
- Legal action: If Strike 3 Holdings LLC obtains your personal information through the subpoena, they may choose to pursue legal action against you for copyright infringement. This can result in fines, damages, and legal fees.
- Reputation damage: If your personal information is made public as part of a legal case, it can damage your reputation and personal life.
What should you do if you received a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena in your patent-attorney-texas case?
If you receive a Strike 3 Holdings LLC ISP subpoena, it is important to take action to protect yourself. Here are some steps you should take:
- Consult with an attorney: A subpoena is a legal matter, and it is important to seek legal advice. The Cashman Law Firm PLLC has been defending clients in copyright infringement lawsuits since 2010. We can help you understand your options and protect your rights.
As you can see from the name of your lawsuit, “No case name found. (Case No. patent-attorney-texas)” your name is not yet known to anyone, not even the No full court name found..
However if you end up having us represent you, it’s best to do it before you are named and served and are thrown into litigation.
Litigation might be the direction you want to go, but it is better if your attorney is the one who leads you into litigation, and not the plaintiff attorney.
- Don’t ignore the subpoena: While there have been strategies we have employed in ignoring the subpoena, as a general rule, ignoring the subpoena can result in serious consequences.
It is important to hire an attorney before the ISP complies with the subpoena in the patent-attorney-texas case so that you can take the appropriate legal action.
- File a Motion to Quash the ISP subpoena (or better, don’t): ISP subpoena letters subtly inform you that you could file a Motion to Quash to prevent the ISP from disclosing your identity. In theory this is correct, but in practice, filing a Motion to Quash the ISP subpoena might be a bad idea.
A Motion to Quash does not stop the plaintiff attorney from filing another No case name found. lawsuit in your home state’s federal court.
And, the plaintiff attorney will claim that you do not have standing to file a Motion to Quash because you are not yet named and served as a defendant. You are still a “John Doe” [placeholder] defendant.
- Consider settling: Every time Strike 3 Holdings LLC files a lawsuit in a federal court, they are hoping that you will settle the claims against you. This is why they filed the $case_number case.
Strike 3 Holdings is hoping that you will panic and contact them directly, (or that you will mistakenly hire a volume-based “settlement factory” attorney who will scare you into settling the claims against you).
There are “pros and cons” about settling the claims against you. Settling provides you certainty and a concrete outcome.
If you settle, you are paying Strike 3 Holdings LLC to release you from the lawsuit and agree never to sue you again.
But whether you settle should not be based on whether you get ‘scared.’ It should be based on whether you actually did the downloading or not (or other factors I outline more in depth here).
Simply put, if you did not download their copyrighted titles, then you should NOT settle or pay them anything.
If you did do the downloading (even if you did a lot of downloading), there are strategies and methods (here is an example) to minimize the settlement amount you might decide to pay them.
–> FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC: Again, if you have been implicated as a John Doe defendant in your No case name found. (Case No. patent-attorney-texas lawsuit, the TWO (2) MAIN ARTICLES you should read IMMEDIATELY are below:
Once you’ve read these two cases and you want to go more in depth, here are the two IN-DEPTH ARTICLES which should answer any other questions you might have.
1. “Everything You Need To Know in One Page About Your Strike 3 Holdings Lawsuit [FAQ]”
2. “In-Depth Strike 3 Holdings. Their Lawsuits, Their Strategies, and Their SETTLEMENTS”
FOR IMMEDIATE CONTACT WITH AN ATTORNEY ABOUT YOUR patent-attorney-texas CASE: To set up a free consultation to speak to an attorney about your No case name found. lawsuit in the No full court name found., click here. Lastly, please feel free to e-mail me at info[at] cashmanlawfirm.com, or call or SMS 713-364-3476 to speak to me now about your case (I do prefer you read the articles first), or to get your questions answered.
CONTACT FORM: If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.