Strike 3 Holdings LLC filed roughly 36 copyright infringement lawsuits in federal courts (US District Courts) across the US in the past 30 days (this time last year, they were filing on average 111 cases each month). They appear to have focused their lawsuits on the US District Courts in the states of California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania. As often as it is useful, I will be listing the Strike Holdings cases which are filed in each state.
Strike 3 Holdings LLC is a well known copyright troll, and our TorrentLawyer.com blog (owned by the Cashman Law Firm PLLC) has written about them extensively. I’m not sure I love the idea of doing it this way, but I would like to list in one page the list of Strike 3 Holdings LLC cases filed in each state. I plan on repeating this process each month (or if too cumbersome, once every three months). I also ask that other attorneys DO NOT COPY THIS LIST, AS I HAVE COMPILED THIS LIST MYSELF AT MY OWN EXPENSE.
What is a Copyright Troll?
A “copyright troll” is an entity — usually a production studio, a film or movie studio, or some other copyright holder — which decides that it is more profitable to sue downloaders rather than to adhere to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) rules in attempting to remove bittorrent links which allow these end users to unlawfully access their copyrighted titles.
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
It is now 2/10/2020, and I am going “back in time” to write this article, and I won’t hide why. Many of you from the December 2019 lawsuits are only now receiving ISP subpoena notices, and I wanted to be sure that as soon as you type in your case, at least something relevant will show up that will point you to where you can get help.
Other “Strike 3 Holdings by month” articles that I have written thus far are for the MARCH 2019, and APRIL 2019 (until now, there was not a need to write an update).
Mid-2019, there was a “shake up” of attorneys who were authorized to represent Strike 3 Holdings. You could read about that drama here in the article entitled, “Why Incorrect Attorneys Are Listed on Strike 3 Holdings LLC Case Dockets,” published on 5/3/2019.
More recently, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has devised a way to unmask the identities of HUNDREDS (perhaps thousands) of defendants without needing to sue each defendant in Federal Court. They have done this by exploiting the Florida “Pure Bill of Discovery” laws, and thus far, the judges are allowing them to proceed.
Without going into too much detail, if you are involved in a Miami-Dade Florida state-based lawsuit, there is much that you will need to understand, as these cases differ from the copyright infringement lawsuits which are filed in federal courts.
- INITIAL ARTICLE EXPLAINING HOW THEY ARE USING THE STATE COURTS TO UNMASK DEFENDANTS’ IDENTITIES.
- FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE EXPOSING THE ATTORNEYS BEHIND THE SCHEME
- RECENT ARTICLE EXPLAINING HOW DEFENSE ATTORNEYS ARE LURING DEFENDANTS IN WITH A “BAIT AND SWITCH” WHICH ENDS UP FORCING THEM TO SETTLE OR BE SUED.
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
WHERE TO LEARN ABOUT THE STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES?
For those of you looking for an initial understanding of the Strike 3 Holdings LLC copyright holder, you can click here to read the “JUST THE FACTS – STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC” article I wrote about them.
For those of you looking to delve deeper into who is Strike 3 Holdings LLC and what are they looking for, you can click here to read the “EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW IN ONE PAGE ABOUT YOUR STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC” article I wrote shortly afterwards.
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
CALIFORNIA STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 1/2020)
Strike 3 Holdings California Central District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 8:19-cv-02431)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe (Case No. 2:19-cv-10671)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 137.25.32.18 (Case No. 8:19-cv-02428)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 75.84.181.123 (Case No. 2:19-cv-10674)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 45.49.233.148 (Case No. 2:19-cv-10673)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe infringer identified as using IP address 47.157.80.141 (Case No. 2:20-cv-00042)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.250.65.102 (Case No. 2:20-cv-00024)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.117.191.225 (Case No. 2:20-cv-00034)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 47.151.151.253 (Case No. 2:20-cv-00238)
California Northern District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.130.70.230 (Case No. 5:19-cv-08231)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.102.26.213 (Case No. 3:19-cv-08239)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:20-cv-00068)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:19-cv-02452)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:19-cv-02488)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:20-cv-00067)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
CONNECTICUT STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 1/2020)
Connecticut District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 3:20-cv-00100)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
FLORIDA STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 1/2020)
Florida Middle District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 8:19-cv-03143)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.196.216.110 (Case No. 8:20-cv-00101)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.195.253.197 (Case No. 8:19-cv-03077)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 35.138.167.172 (Case No. 8:19-cv-03100)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
ILLINOIS STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 1/2020)
Illinois Northern District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-08148)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:20-cv-00482)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-08163)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:20-cv-00161)
MICHIGAN STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 1/2020)
Michigan Eastern District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe infringer identified as using IP Address 99.188.204.18 (Case No. 2:20-cv-10143)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 108.244.198.157 (Case No. 2:20-cv-10098)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
NEW YORK STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 2/2020)
New York Eastern District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 67.245.246.132 (Case No. 1:19-cv-07256)
New York Southern District Court
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-11466)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-11462)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-11465)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-11464)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:19-cv-11461)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe (Case No. 1:20-cv-00554)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
PENNSYLVANIA STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC CASES (12/2019 – 2/2020)
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE (Case No. 5:19-cv-06010)
Have you read enough? Book Now to get help. > > >
—
[CONTACT AN ATTORNEY: If you have a question for an attorney about the Strike 3 Holdings LLC cases and options on how to proceed (even specifically for your case), you can e-mail us at info[at]cashmanlawfirm.com, you can set up a free and confidential phone consultation to speak to us about your Strike 3 Holdings LLC case, or you can call us at 713-364-3476 (this is our Cashman Law Firm, PLLC’s number].
CONTACT FORM: If you have a question or comment about what I have written, and you want to keep it *for my eyes only*, please feel free to use the form below. The information you post will be e-mailed to me, and I will be happy to respond.
NOTE: No attorney client relationship is established by sending this form, and while the attorney-client privilege (which keeps everything that you share confidential and private) attaches immediately when you contact me, I do not become your attorney until we sign a contract together. That being said, please do not state anything “incriminating” about your case when using this form, or more practically, in any e-mail.